I received the following comment and thought the response deserved a post of its very own:
I must admit though, that the description of your schedule leaves me completely baffled! I'm familiar with the British school system, and currently teach teenagers in a local college, so I naively assumed I'd be able to make some sort of sense of American terms. But nope.
I'm pretty sure that "Lit" is literature, but the rest is largely a jumble of letters. I don't really expect you to explain how all this works, but I felt the need to explain that there is someone somewhere who read this without comprehension.
For example, I've never got to grips with what "ninth-graders" means (presumably it's some indication of progress through the school system -typically how old is a ninth-grader? is this the same 9 that appears in your schedule period titles?) And what does the "Honors" and "Gen" indicate?
Kids in American must attend school until they are 16. Most work to receive a diploma at around age 18. School begins with Kindergarten at age 5. Kindergarten thru 5th grade is elementary school, 6th thru 8th grade is middle school and 9th-12th grade is high school. Kids may earn several kinds of diplomas in high school. Most choose to work on a vocational/technical (training for work) diploma or a college preparation diploma. Some do a combination of both. After high school, 4-year college, 2-year college, vocational school, or jobs await students.
In most high schools, each grade covers specific course material. In English, in my school district, 9th graders do a general intro to different modes of writing and different genres of literature, in 10th grade they study American Literature, in 11th grade World Literature, and in 12th grade British Literature. Most school in the U.S. use these groupings but not all in the same progression.
A typical ninth grader is about 14.
Most schools here "track" students, and there is a huge, on-going debate as to whether this practice is a good idea or not. Basically students are grouped by ability. Therefore, all the low-performing students learn in the same class and all the gifted kids learn together in a different class. On my schedule the type of class is indicated by a G, H or I. General level is for average performing kids. Honors is for high performing or gifted students. Inclusion classes include students that have special needs such as behavioral, mental, physical disorders/challenges. Totally separately, there are special education teachers who teach students with difficulties that are not able to be in regular classrooms. These teachers receive special training to teach this special needs group.
I'm also puzzled that you only seem to have four "periods" for a whole semester. What (and how long) is a period? Is that the same four every day? Do they run consecutively for a few weeks each? Do you have big gaps between them? I just can't get my head round it.
Some schools have 40 or 50 minute classes and students take 6 or 7 classes all at the same time. My school runs on "block" scheduling which basically means students take fewer classes at a time and classes last longer. In the interest of providing students more depth instead of just breadth, students take 4 classes at a time and each class period lasts 90 minutes. More and more schools are moving to this type of schedule but there is lot of variety in the ways schools use block scheduling. In my school, students take the same classes every day. For example, a student may have English, History, Physical Education and Music in fall semester and then Science, Math, Foreign Language and an Elective class (art, music, computer stuff, etc) during spring semester.
Is the "Planning" something that you will teach, or something that you do instead of (or to prepare for) teaching?
Planning is time for a teacher to prepare lessons, grade and generally collect herself/himself to teach again. My planning includes 25 minutes for lunch.
Finally, I'm intrigued that you seem uneasy with "British Lit". When I studied this (OK, we called it "English Lit", but that's just local smugness, I guess) we covered the likes of Shakespeare, Chaucer, Wordsworth. Is John Donne mandatory for you?
Ignore me. It's really a self-confidence thing. I really enjoy British Lit, but it has been the material I've perceived as being "hard" before I studied it. I was scared to death of Chaucer before I took it and I thought I'd hate it. But I read the whole darn Canterbury Tales in middle English (thank you very much), and I loved it! Part of why I love it is because I had a fabulous professor and a lively, intelligent class that really brought the material to life for me. I have an easier time learning some things in a more structured way rather than reading on my own.
Except Shakespeare. I lack Shakespeare. I know it’s a terrible thing, but there you go. I took a Shakespeare comedies and histories class as an undergraduate and I had a terribly abusive teacher who made me sit under my desk if I didn't answer precisely what he wanted to hear. I stopped listening to him after awhile. I just fear, at least as a starting teacher, teaching things I haven't studied really well.
John Donne isn't mandatory, but smart people like to throw his name around as evidence of their intelligence. Very irritating.
I'm sure I'd love teaching British Lit if I had to. I do love a good, Victorian novel and current writers like Zadie Smith. I think my fear stems from questioning my ability to connect Chaucer, Shakespeare, Wordsworth, etc. to the lives of my students in a way that makes the work approachable and interesting.
There you go. I'm only partly knowledgeable. You other people, feel free to add on and correct.
Recent Comments